| 
Article No. 1 in a Series
 |
Rebecca
McKay
Senior Literacy Fellow, Cornerstone
|
 |
Excerpt from The Big Box, Toni Morrison with Slade
Morrison:
... Patty used to live with a two-way door in a little white house
near us. But she had too much fun in school all day and made
the grownups nervous.
...
So the teachers who loved her had a meeting one-day to try to
find a cure. They thought and talked and thought some more till
finally they were sure. "Oh, Patty, they said, "you're
an awfully sweet girl with a lot of potential inside you. "but
you have to know how far |
Assessment
is the hot topic even in children's
picture books such as The Big Box by Toni Morrison. I am
convinced that children's picture books are really written for adults.
This one is especially poignant as it depicts possibilities when
children do not fit the expectations of adults...they are labeled,
separated from others, and dished up a remedy that often impedes
their freedom to learn and really just be children!
In preparation
for writing this introductory assessment article, I have read extensively.
It seems as though everything I
pick up
including the local newspaper has a twist that points toward assessment!
Sunday's local paper was entitled, NCLB. The article's
subtitle bemoaned the labeling of one area school as failing because
of high stakes testing and assessment.
For many years, I had the
honor of teaching first-grade. Quite often, the majority of the
children would be sent to my class labeled as
strugglers. Contrary to the negatives that are in the media about
testing and assessment, I found that my teacher-designed assessments
were effective in moving the children quickly past their old labels.
This contradiction spurred my desire to explain fully and support
what I had experienced by defining and naming the type of assessment
that I found so useful. I was on a mission!
Reading a Peter Johnston text, Knowing literacy:
Constructive literacy assessment, I discovered a reference to assessment terminology
dating to Latin derivations. Assessment as a term has its origins
in the Latin word testa meaning " a piece of burned clay or
skull." The word test gradually became more
common and described a process for testing metals by burning them
in a clay skull-shaped
container. A fifth-grader I interviewed recently gave a similar description!
Amazingly, accurate in his interpretation, this wiry fifth grader
spouted out his feelings about standardized testing, "Aw, it's
just a way to make us look dumb. I'm bad you know. I'm
not very good at school and reading!" That comment put a lump
in my throat!
Interviewing students really provides a startling and heart wrenching
view of the massive standardized testing that our children endure
in the name of teacher accountability. These tests, summative in
nature, seem to do little to help teachers or the children they serve
to improve student learning or instructional practice. On the other
hand, recently I observed second-grade students clamoring to sit
alongside Dianne Nicholson, a Stemley teacher. They wanted to show
off their reading.
As Dianne
marked in a clever little book emblazoned with a student's name,
the small boy leaned over and whispered as he rubbed the book like
a magic lamp, "I love this...I'm
getting better...right?" She smiled as she placed a sticky
note on the page that recorded his oral reading fluency and her comment: "Keep
practicing. Your retell was excellent. Work on your sequencing with
a partner. I'll read with you again tomorrow!" It was
clear that Dianne loved this process of taking a running record as
much as the small boy had loved sitting alongside her!
This second-grade version of formative assessment actually impacts
student learning and the practice of teaching. This scene truly fits
the word assessment as a derivative of the Latin term, assidere,
meaning to sit alongside. Dianne was accurately evaluating her student's
reading, making suggestions, and forming her next teaching moves.
He knew and she knew how they both could become better. Isn't
this what we should really be striving toward in our schools? This
seems fitting since the word evaluation has the root word value and
the prefix 'e' to build its meaning: from strength, worth,
or value.
In summary,
assessment that makes a positive difference refers to all those
actions undertaken by teachers—and by their
students in assessing themselves. These activities supply a wealth
of information to be used as feedback to modify, change, and improve teaching and learning.
Such assessment thus moves into another realm becoming a dynamic
living part of teaching that is often referred
to as formative assessment. In this type of assessment, evidence
gathered is actually used to adapt teaching to meet student needs
(Black and Wiliam, 1998). This was the definition I needed to name
what I had experienced in my years as a first-grade teacher as well
as what I observed in Dianne's classroom. Her use of formative
assessment as an evaluation tool has certainly painted a vivid, unforgettable
picture in my mind of what happens when teachers pull alongside a
child to look for strengths, to value, and to share the worth of
a child's best efforts!
REFERENCES
Black, P. & Wiliam,
D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom
assessment [online] http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.
Crafton,
L. K. (1996). Narrative writing: Toward a "real kid" report
card. Standards in practice: Grades K-2. Urbana: IL: National Council of Teachers
of English.
Hewitt, G. (1995). A portfolio primer: Teaching,
collecting, and assessing student
writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Johnston, P. H. (1997). Knowing literacy:
Constructive literacy assessment. York,
MN: Stenhouse.
For
further reading, a bibliography taken from the International
Reading Association's
website: [http://www.reading.org/]
Reading Research Quarterly
This journal is oriented toward theory and research; RRQ scrutinizes
issues of literacy faced by learners of all ages and the educators
serving them. Clicking on a link will take you to a table of contents
containing the listed article. From there, click on the appropriate
page number to read the abstract and find out about online purchase
options. You also might find the articles at local or university
libraries, or you may contact the International Reading Association's
order department to purchase hard copies.
-
The road to folly and
redemption: Perspectives on the legitimacy of high-stakes testing,
by Peter Afflerbach (July/Aug/Sept 2002;
vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 348-360).
-
How will literacy be assessed in the
next millennium?, by Robert J. Tierney, Peter Johnson, David W. Moore,
and Sheila W. Valencia
(Apr/May/June 2000; vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 276-282)
-
Political acts: Literacy
learning and teaching, by Arlette Ingram Willis and Violet J. Harris
(Jan/Feb/Mar 2000; vol. 35, no. 1, pp.
72-88)
The Reading Teacher
This journal is designed for preschool, primary, and elementary educators;
RT offers practical advice on the issues affecting current literacy
education. The articles listed below can often be found at local
or university libraries. You may also purchase articles in electronic
format from the International Reading Association article
archive or, for hard copies, contact the order department.
-
Effective instruction
begins with purposeful assessments, by Charlene Cobb (Speaking
to Administrators and Reading Specialists
department;
Dec 2003/Jan 2004; vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 386-388)
-
Assessment conversations,
by Peter Johnston (Sept 2003; vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 90-92)
-
Enhancing
self-efficacy for high-stakes reading tests, by Patrick McCabe (Sept
2003; vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 12-20)
-
They
can read the words, but they can't understand: Refining
comprehension assessment, by Peter Dewitz and Pamela K. Dewitz
(Feb 2003; vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 422-435)
-
Center for the Improvement of Early
Reading Achievement: Measuring children's reading development using
leveled texts, by Scott Paris
(Oct 2002; vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 168-170)
-
Matching texts and readers:
Leveling early reading materials for assessment and instruction,
by Lori Jamison Rog and Wilfred Burton
(Dec 2001/Jan 2002; vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 348-356)
-
High-stakes testing
in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow?, by James V. Hoffman, Lori
Czop Assaf, and Scott G. Paris (Feb 2001; vol. 54,
no. 5, pp. 482-492)
-
Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure,
and inquiry, by Frank Serafini (Dec 2000/Jan 2001; vol. 54, no. 4,
pp. 384-393)
-
Student-generated rubrics: Bringing students into the
assessment process, by Mary Jo Skillings and Robbin Ferrell (Mar
2000; vol.
53, no. 6, pp. 452-458)
Reading Online
This is IRA's free e-journal, ROL. It focuses on classroom practice
and research for literacy educators at all levels. The articles
linked below are among those featured in this interactive, Web-based
journal.
-
Linking
assessment and instruction via Web-based technology: A case study
of a statewide early literacy initiative, by Heather
Partridge,
Marcia Invernizzi, Joanne Meier, and Amie Sullivan (Nov/Dec 2003)
-
Assessment
resources, by Denise Johnson (Sept 2001)
-
High-stakes
testing in our schools: A new report from California, by Dana L.
Grisham (July 2001)
-
Assessment
in media education, by Chris M. Worsnop (Nov 2000)
-
Formative
assessment of reading comprehension by computer: Advantages and
disadvantages
of The Accelerated Reader software, by Keith Topping
(Nov 1999)
Journal
of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
This journal is an open forum for educators interested in adolescent
through adult literacy. JAAL seeks to encourage creative ways of
teaching and studying literacy. The articles listed might be found
at local or university libraries. You may also purchase articles
in electronic format from the IRA article
archive or, for hard
copies, contact the order department.
-
Does the Degrees of Reading
Power assessment reflect the reading process? An eye-movement
examination, by Eric J. Paulson, Jeanne
Henry (Nov 2002; vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 234-244)
Reading Today
The International Reading Association's bimonthly newspaper, Reading Today contains the latest news about trends that influence
literacy education. Articles linked below are freely available among
the IRA online
samples.
-
Expert panel debates high-stakes testing
(Dec 2003/Jan 2004)
-
NAEP writing test shows modest gains (Oct/Nov
2003)
-
Good news, bad news: Latest NAEP scores (Aug/Sept 2003)
-
European
students earn top reading scores (Aug/Sept 2003)
-
The unfairness of
uniformity, by Dale D. Johnson and Bonnie Johnson (Aug/Sept 2002)
-
When
testing lowers standards, by Donald H. Graves (Apr/May 2002)
-
High
stakes: How to get political, by Jill Lewis (Apr/May 2001)
|